Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 12;2016(10):CD002042. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002042.pub4

Carson 1998.

Methods Randomised controlled trial
Participants 84 hip fracture participants undergoing surgical repair who had postoperative Hb levels < 10.0 g/dL were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups:
  • Liberal group: n = 42; M/F = 9/33; mean (SD) age = 81.3 (8.1) years

  • Restrictive group: n = 42; M/F = 11/31; mean (SD) age = 83.3 (10.8) years

Interventions
  • The liberal group received 1 unit of packed RBC at the time of random assignment and as much blood as necessary to keep the Hb level above 10.0 g/dL.

  • The restrictive group received a RBC transfusion for symptoms of anaemia or for a Hb level that dropped below 8.0 g/dL.

Outcomes Mortality, length of hospital stay, blood usage (units), complications, pneumonia, stroke, thromboembolism
Notes
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Randomisation schedules were stratified by clinical site and cardiovascular disease state. The randomisation was designed in blocks of 2 to 8 participants to avoid imbalance within a site.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Study personnel at the clinical sites randomly assigned participants by contacting the data co‐ordinating centre's 24‐hour automated telephone service.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk There was no blinding of participants or personnel.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk The primary outcome of mortality allowed a judgement of low risk of bias. Although function was assessed blinded, the morbidity outcomes were not assessed blindly.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk There were minimal missing data.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk The trial reported all outcomes.
Other bias Low risk No other biases identified.