Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 3;2016(7):CD008870. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008870.pub2

Comparison 9. Mesalamine versus sulfasalazine (alone or in combination with corticosteroids).

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Induction of remission (CDAI < 150) or clinical improvement 2   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
1.1 Salofalk (1.5 g/day) 1 30 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.18 [0.82, 1.70]
1.2 Salofalk (3.0 g/day) 1 50 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.94 [0.75, 1.18]
2 Adverse events 2   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
2.1 Salofalk (1.5 g/day) 1 30 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.11 [0.01, 1.90]
2.2 Salofalk (3.0 g/day) 1 50 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.54 [0.15, 1.93]