Skip to main content
. 2014 Nov 26;2014(11):CD007403. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007403.pub3

Comparison 1. Rubefacient versus placebo.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Clinical success (eg 50% reduction in pain) 10   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
1.1 Acute conditions 4 324 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.93 [1.51, 2.46]
1.2 Chronic conditions 6 455 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.58 [1.22, 2.04]
2 Adverse events 11   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
2.1 Any adverse event 11 984 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.56 [1.19, 2.04]
2.2 Local adverse events 10 869 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 2.15 [1.12, 4.12]
3 Withdrawals 7   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
3.1 Lack of efficacy 5 501 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.36 [0.15, 0.87]
3.2 Adverse events 7 737 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 4.19 [1.52, 11.56]