Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 6;2016(7):CD009323. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009323.pub3

Beenen 2014.

Study characteristics
Patient sampling Sample size: 131
Females: Not stated
Age: Not stated
Patient characteristics and setting Patients with CT and ultrasound resectable periampullary cancer
Setting: Secondary/tertiary care, the Netherlands
Index tests Diagnostic laparoscopy
Criteria for positive diagnosis: Biopsy confirmation of suspicious lesions
Target condition and reference standard(s) Target condition: Unresectability
Reference standard: Laparotomy
Criteria for positive diagnosis: Locally advanced pancreatic cancer or metastatic pancreatic cancer
Flow and timing Number of indeterminates for whom the results of reference standard were available: 0
Number of patients who were excluded from the analysis: 74 (36.1%)
Comparative  
Notes  
Methodological quality
Item Authors' judgement Risk of bias Applicability concerns
DOMAIN 1: Patient Selection
Was a consecutive or random sample of patients enrolled? No    
Was a case‐control design avoided? Yes    
Did the study avoid inappropriate exclusions? Unclear    
    High High
DOMAIN 2: Index Test All tests
Were the index test results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the reference standard? No    
    Low Low
DOMAIN 3: Reference Standard
Is the reference standards likely to correctly classify the target condition? Unclear    
Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index tests? No    
    Unclear Low
DOMAIN 4: Flow and Timing
Was there an appropriate interval between index test and reference standard? Unclear    
Did all patients receive the same reference standard? Yes    
Were all patients included in the analysis? No    
    High