Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 6;2016(7):CD009323. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009323.pub3

Warshaw 1986.

Study characteristics
Patient sampling Sample size: 40
Females: Not stated
Age: Not stated
Patient characteristics and setting Patients with potentially resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma (after CT scan)
Setting: Surgical centre in the USA
Index tests Diagnostic laparoscopy
Criteria for positive diagnosis: Biopsies of lesions suspicious of metastases
Target condition and reference standard(s) Target condition: Unresectability
Reference standard: Laparotomy for patients with no evidence of metastases on laparoscopy; biopsy with histolopathological confirmation of spread for patients with suspected metastases
Criteria for positive diagnosis: Not stated
Flow and timing Number of indeterminates for whom the results of reference standard were available: Not stated
Number of patients who were excluded from the analysis: Not stated
Comparative  
Notes  
Methodological quality
Item Authors' judgement Risk of bias Applicability concerns
DOMAIN 1: Patient Selection
Was a consecutive or random sample of patients enrolled? Unclear    
Was a case‐control design avoided? Yes    
Did the study avoid inappropriate exclusions? Unclear    
    Unclear Low
DOMAIN 2: Index Test All tests
Were the index test results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the reference standard? Yes    
    Low Low
DOMAIN 3: Reference Standard
Is the reference standards likely to correctly classify the target condition? Unclear    
Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index tests? No    
    Unclear Low
DOMAIN 4: Flow and Timing
Was there an appropriate interval between index test and reference standard? Unclear    
Did all patients receive the same reference standard? No    
Were all patients included in the analysis? No    
    High  

CT: computed tomography
 EUS: endoscopic ultrasound