Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 12;2016(10):CD008536. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008536.pub3

Baracat 2002.

Methods Randomised controlled trial; open label, multi‐centre
Participants 85 generally healthy postmenopausal women, with an intact uterus, in menopause for ≥ 4 years, absence of endometrial hyperplasia, mean age 52 years
Interventions
  • Tibolone 2.5 mg/d

  • CEE/MPA 0.625 mg/5.0 mg/d


For 13 treatment cycles, each of 28 days
Outcomes Hot flushes, unscheduled bleeding, vaginal dryness, painful intercourse, endometrial hyperplasia
Notes Timing: not available
Location: Brasil
Multi‐centre: number of sites not specified
Hot flushes not measured with a validated score (frequency and intensity of hot flushes for each participant in each cycle were calculated as the sum of the mean # of hot flushes per day multiplied by the respective score (1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe)
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Describe: “the randomization was performed in balanced blocks of ten subjects using the table of aleatory numbers; each study center received 20 envelopes with the number of the subject and respective code (treatment group)” (p 62)
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Describe: “the randomization was performed in balanced blocks of ten subjects using the table of aleatory numbers; each study center received 20 envelopes with the number of the subject and respective code (treatment group)” (p 62)
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Describe: open‐label design
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Describe: participants unblinded to treatment allocation
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Describe: similar rates of discontinuation, reasons given
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Study protocol not available
Conflict of interest High risk Describe: sponsored by manufacturer of CEE/MPA