Baracat 2002.
Methods | Randomised controlled trial; open label, multi‐centre | |
Participants | 85 generally healthy postmenopausal women, with an intact uterus, in menopause for ≥ 4 years, absence of endometrial hyperplasia, mean age 52 years | |
Interventions |
For 13 treatment cycles, each of 28 days |
|
Outcomes | Hot flushes, unscheduled bleeding, vaginal dryness, painful intercourse, endometrial hyperplasia | |
Notes | Timing: not available Location: Brasil Multi‐centre: number of sites not specified Hot flushes not measured with a validated score (frequency and intensity of hot flushes for each participant in each cycle were calculated as the sum of the mean # of hot flushes per day multiplied by the respective score (1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe) |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Describe: “the randomization was performed in balanced blocks of ten subjects using the table of aleatory numbers; each study center received 20 envelopes with the number of the subject and respective code (treatment group)” (p 62) |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Describe: “the randomization was performed in balanced blocks of ten subjects using the table of aleatory numbers; each study center received 20 envelopes with the number of the subject and respective code (treatment group)” (p 62) |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Describe: open‐label design |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Describe: participants unblinded to treatment allocation |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Describe: similar rates of discontinuation, reasons given |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Study protocol not available |
Conflict of interest | High risk | Describe: sponsored by manufacturer of CEE/MPA |