Hammar 2007.
Methods | Randomised controlled trial | |
Participants | 572 postmenopausal healthy women with an intact uterus, with or without vasomotor symptoms. Mean age 55 years. Time since menopause 5 years. Mean number of hot flashes at baseline 5.8 | |
Interventions |
Administered for 48 weeks |
|
Outcomes | Unscheduled vaginal bleeding or spotting, hot flashes, thromboembolic events, breast cancer | |
Notes | Hot flashes measured as median number per treatment period and reported as graph Timing: from November 2002 to March 2005 Location: 7 Northern European countries Multi‐centre: 32 centres |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Restricted block‐wise randomisation (1:1 ratio within each specific site). No details on random generation of the allocation sequence, but use of an interactive voice response system should keep risk of selection bias very low |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Automatic interactive voice response system |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Double‐blind, double‐dummy method |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Investigators, study site personnel and participants remained blinded until after database was locked |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | 87% of randomised participants analysed but reasons for withdrawals/dropouts not given |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Outcomes assessed in the study and of specific interest for the review had been indicated in the protocol |
Conflict of interest | High risk | Financed by the drug producer. One study author was an employee of the drug producer |