Kubista 2007.
| Methods | Randomised placebo‐controlled trial | |
| Participants | 102 postmenopausal women with initially stage I or II, oestrogen receptor–positive (ER+), previously untreated, core‐biopsy proven, invasive breast cancer without evidence of metastatic spread; any endocrine or enzyme modulator therapy was stopped ≥ 3 months before randomisation. Mean age 65 years. Mean time since menopause 17 years | |
| Interventions |
Administered for 14 days |
|
| Outcomes | Ischaemic stroke, breast tumoural markers | |
| Notes | Tumoural markers (surrogate outcome) measured as median/mean Timing: March 2003 to April 2005 Location: unclear Multi‐centre: 14 sites in 5 countries (not provided) |
|
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No information provided |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No information provided |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Placebo‐controlled and defined as "double‐blind" (1 pill administered per day) |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Not specified, but given the nature of the outcome assessed (stroke), its evaluation is likely to be "objective" |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Stroke evaluated referring to the "all subject treated group" |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Some of the outcomes indicated in the protocol were assessed and reported in the study publication. Those not reported were of no interest for the review. Additional data on ischaemic stroke were available in the study publication and were included in this review |
| Conflict of interest | High risk | Financed by the drug manufacturer. Two study authors were employees of the drug manufacturer |