Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 4;2016(10):CD001071. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001071.pub3

Field 1982.

Methods Parallel‐group randomised controlled trial
Participants Participants: 57 preterm infants
Mean birth weight: 1300 grams
Mean gestational age: 32 weeks
Mean postnatal age: study began day 1
Setting: neonatal unit, USA
Inclusion criteria: birth weight < 1800 grams and < 35 weeks gestational age.
Exclusion criteria: major congenital abnormalities, chromosomal abnormalities, oropharyngeal problems, and conditions known to be incompatible with life
Interventions Experimental group: NNS during gavage feeding. Infants were given the pacifiers whether or not they made an effort to suck. Bottle feeding began when infants weighed 1500 grams, and their medical condition was stable
Control: no pacifier during gavage feeding
Both groups: infants were allowed a pacifier at any other time, but only the treatment babies received the pacifier during gavage feedings.
Outcomes Days of tube feedings
 Number of tube feeds
 Weight gain
 Length of hospital stay
 Cost of hospital stay
Brazelton Neonatal Behavioral Assessment undertaken after each infant was placed in their crib. This was divided into 4 dimensions:
  1. interactive processes;

  2. motoric processes;

  3. organizational processes ‐ state control;

  4. organizational processes ‐ physiologic response to stress.


Bottle feeding interactions: were observed when the infant was placed in a crib in a minimal care nursery. Behaviors considered included: looking at the infant, talking to the infant, repositioning the infant and "jiggling" the infant's bottle. To assess feeding performance, trialists coded the incidence of regurgitation and the volume of formula intake and recorded the length of feeding time.
Notes
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Stratified random sampling technique
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Blinding of intervention ‐ no
Blinding of outcome assessors ‐ unclear
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Complete follow‐up ‐ yes
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Study protocol not obtained