Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 10;9:5883. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41904-9

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Comparison of simulation results with the experimental data. The upper row shows the histograms for the base-10 logarithm of the peak amplitude and width of p53 oscillation and p53-Mdm2 delay divided by their respective mean values, respectively. The lower row shows the corresponding experimental data from ref.11. 1000 runs of stochastic simulations lasting 3000 min are performed with S = 0.3, Ω = 104, D = 0.04, and τ = 1000 min. Red curves are fittings by Gaussian density function (2πσ2)−1/2exp[−(x − μ)2/(2σ2)] with (μ, σ) = (−0.091, 0.28) (a), (−0.026, 0.14) (b), (−0.017, 0.12) (c), (0, 0.22) (d), (0, 0.13) (e), and (0, 0.11) (f). The average CVs are marked in the figure. For (a)–(c), the CV can be estimated as follows: CV = σ0/μ0, where μ0=exp[(μ+log10x¯)ln10+(σln10)2/2], σ02={exp[(σln10)2]1}exp[2(μ+log10x¯)ln10+(σln10)2], and x¯ is the corresponding mean value: x¯=11761 for amplitude, 118 min for width, and 101 min for p53-Mdm2 delay.