Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 4;10:682. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00682

Table 2.

Number of positive cases for the respective age group, according to different diagnostic approaches.

Age group Number tested Positives (n/%) Tested* Positives (n/%) PCR*
Microscopy UCAA– SCAA–
2–9 32 0 3/9.4 4/13 26 2/7.7
10–19 58 0 12/20 12/21 39 3/7.7
20–29 38 0 16/42 16/42 17 5/29
30–39 43 3/7 20/47 20/47 20 6/30
40–49 35 1/2.8 11/31 14/40 14 1/7.1
50–59 23 0 9/39 6/26 5 2/40
>60 29 0 9/31 10/35 7 0
Total 258 4/1.6 80/31 82/32 128 19/15

UCAA–: UCP-LF CAA assay detecting circulating anodic antigen in urine, indecisive results were considered as negative; SCAA–: UCP-LF CAA assay detecting circulating anodic antigen in serum, indecisive results were considered as negative;

*

PCR was performed by sampling (n = 128).