Table 1.
The set of ‘best’ models for the author recommendations and effect sizes (log response ratios), as identified using information-theoretic criteria (ΔAICc < 2). Models of effect sizes all included a random effects term for Study.
| model | parameters | log-likelihood | ΔAICc | Akaike weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| author recommendations—proportional odds model | ||||
| Camera type + Use of attractants | 4 | −98.42 | 0 | 0.30 |
| Camera type + Use of attractants + Habitat openness | 5 | −97.93 | 1.23 | 0.16 |
| Camera type + Use of attractants + Latitude | 5 | −98.31 | 1.99 | 0.11 |
| effect sizes—linear mixed-effects model | ||||
| Camera type + Habitat openness + Metric + Comparison survey method | 17 | −1022.24 | 0 | 0.27 |
| Camera type + Metric + Comparison survey method | 16 | −1023.95 | 1.29 | 0.14 |