Table 4.
χ 2 | t | df | p | Effect size r | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
THI | |||||
ANOVA | 9.18∗ | 3 | 0.027 | ||
t1-t2 | -2.76∗ | 69 | 0.011 | 0.32 | |
t1-t3 | -2.30∗ | 69 | 0.037 | 0.27 | |
t1-t4 | -2.34∗ | 69 | 0.033 | 0.27 | |
TQ | |||||
ANOVA | 5.24 | 3 | 0.155 | ||
t1-t2 | -1.48 | 69 | 0.214 | 0.18 | |
t1-t3 | -1.54 | 69 | 0.192 | 0.18 | |
t1-t4 | -2.21∗ | 69 | 0.046 | 0.26 | |
Loudness | |||||
ANOVA | 12.4∗∗ | 3 | 0.006 | ||
t1-t2 | -2.74∗ | 69 | 0.012 | 0.31 | |
t1-t3 | -0.45 | 69 | 0.978 | 0.05 | |
t1-t4 | 0.63 | 69 | 0.794 | 0.08 | |
| |||||
Ratio EEG-NT | |||||
ANOVA | 3.54 | 2 | 0.170 | ||
t1-t2 | 0.72 | 46 | 0.475 | 0.11 | |
t1-t3 | 1.86∗ | 46 | 0.069 | 0.26 | |
IAF EEG-NT | |||||
ANOVA | 0.99 | 2 | 0.610 | ||
t1-t2 | 0.83 | 46 | 0.409 | 0.12 | |
t1-t3 | 0.86 | 46 | 0.394 | 0.13 | |
Delta EEG-NT | |||||
ANOVA | 1.24 | 2 | 0.539 | ||
t1-t2 | 0.15 | 46 | 0.885 | 0.02 | |
t1-t3 | -0.87 | 46 | 0.390 | 0.13 | |
| |||||
Ratio EEG-WT | |||||
ANOVA | 7.77∗ | 2 | 0.021 | ||
t1-t2 | 2.83∗∗ | 46 | 0.007 | 0.39 | |
t1-t3 | 1.21 | 46 | 0.234 | 0.17 | |
IAF EEG-WT | |||||
ANOVA | 0.51 | 2 | 0.776 | ||
t1-t2 | 0.69 | 46 | 0.494 | 0.10 | |
t1-t3 | 0.24 | 46 | 0.811 | 0.04 | |
Delta EEG-WT | |||||
ANOVA | 5.74 | 2 | 0.057 | ||
t1-t2 | -2.42∗ | 46 | 0.020 | 0.34 | |
t1-t3 | -1.13 | 46 | 0.263 | 0.16 |
Note: p values of contrast analysis are Bonferroni corrected and one-tailed. ∗∗p < .01; ∗p < .05.