Table 4.
Logistic regression to correct the association of MFN-2 gene polymorphisms with TAD.
| SNP | Models | Genotype | OR (95%CI)a | Pa |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs2336384 | Additive | GG vs. GT vs. TT | 0.876 (0.687–1.117) | 0.287 |
| Dominant | (GG+GT) vs. TT | 1.045 (0.679–1.607) | 0.842 | |
| Recessive | GG vs. (GT+TT) | 0.707 (0.483–1.034) | 0.074 | |
| Homozygote | GG vs. TT | 0.818 (0.498–1.343) | 0.427 | |
| rs2295281 | Additive | TT vs. CT vs. CC | 0.930 (0.728–1.187) | 0.561 |
| Dominant | (TT+CT) vs. CC | 0.540 (0.320–0.911) | 0.021 | |
| Recessive | TT vs. (CT+CC) | 1.198 (0.839–1.709) | 0.320 | |
| Homozygote | TT vs. CC | 0.649 (0.368–1.144) | 0.134 | |
| rs17037564 | Additive | GG vs. AG vs. AA | 1.143 (0.804–1.625) | 0.456 |
| Dominant | (GG+AG) vs. AA | 0.565 (0.119–2.686) | 0.473 | |
| Recessive | GG vs. (AG+AA) | 1.238 (0.826–1.857) | 0.301 | |
| Homozygote | GG vs. AA | 0.473 (0.102–2.184) | 0.327 | |
| rs2236058 | Additive | GG vs. CG vs. CC | 0.906 (0.709–1.156) | 0.426 |
| Dominant | (GG+CG) vs. CC | 1.317 (0.884–1.963) | 0.176 | |
| Recessive | GG vs. (CG+CC) | 0.545 (0.351–0.845) | 0.007 | |
| Homozygote | GG vs. CC | 0.861 (0.662–1.119) | 0.861 | |
| rs3766741 | Dominant | (CG+GG) vs. CC | 0.443 (0.062–3.167) | 0.405 |