Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 7;137(4):445–448. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.6912

Table 2. Initiation of Retinal Interventions in Patients With Minimal Retinopathy During 2 Years.

Intervention No. of Interventions for Diabetic Eye Disease (Type of Intervention)a No. of Interventions Not for Diabetic Eye Disease (Type of Intervention)b Total
Year 1
PPV 2 (1 TRD, 1 NCVH) 2 (1 RRD, 1 ERM) 4
Laser 5 (PRP for PDR) 1 (Retinopexy) 6
Intravitreal injection 3 (Anti-VEGF for ME) 2 (1 Anti-VEGF for postoperative ME, 1 anti-VEGF for exudative age-related macular degeneration) 5
Year 2
PPV 0 1 (ERM) 1
Laser 2 (1 FML for ME, 1 PRP for PDR) 0 2
Intravitreal injection 1 (Anti-VEGF for ME) 0 1
First 2 y combined
PPV 2 3 5
Laser 7 1 8
Intravitreal injection 4 2 6

Abbreviations: ERM, epiretinal membrane; FML, focal macular laser; ME, macular edema; MH, macular hole; NCVH, nonclearing vitreous hemorrhage; PDR, proliferative diabetic retinopathy; PPV, pars plana vitrectomy; PRP, panretinal photocoagulation; RRD, rhegmatogenous retinal detachment; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.

a

Eleven patients required intervention during first 2 years; 1 patient required both PPV and laser, and 1 patient required both laser and injection.

b

Five patients required intervention during first 2 years; 1 patient required both PPV and laser.