Table 2. Initiation of Retinal Interventions in Patients With Minimal Retinopathy During 2 Years.
Intervention | No. of Interventions for Diabetic Eye Disease (Type of Intervention)a | No. of Interventions Not for Diabetic Eye Disease (Type of Intervention)b | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Year 1 | |||
PPV | 2 (1 TRD, 1 NCVH) | 2 (1 RRD, 1 ERM) | 4 |
Laser | 5 (PRP for PDR) | 1 (Retinopexy) | 6 |
Intravitreal injection | 3 (Anti-VEGF for ME) | 2 (1 Anti-VEGF for postoperative ME, 1 anti-VEGF for exudative age-related macular degeneration) | 5 |
Year 2 | |||
PPV | 0 | 1 (ERM) | 1 |
Laser | 2 (1 FML for ME, 1 PRP for PDR) | 0 | 2 |
Intravitreal injection | 1 (Anti-VEGF for ME) | 0 | 1 |
First 2 y combined | |||
PPV | 2 | 3 | 5 |
Laser | 7 | 1 | 8 |
Intravitreal injection | 4 | 2 | 6 |
Abbreviations: ERM, epiretinal membrane; FML, focal macular laser; ME, macular edema; MH, macular hole; NCVH, nonclearing vitreous hemorrhage; PDR, proliferative diabetic retinopathy; PPV, pars plana vitrectomy; PRP, panretinal photocoagulation; RRD, rhegmatogenous retinal detachment; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.
Eleven patients required intervention during first 2 years; 1 patient required both PPV and laser, and 1 patient required both laser and injection.
Five patients required intervention during first 2 years; 1 patient required both PPV and laser.