Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 8;14:2515–2531. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S190502

Table 4.

Results of regression analysis and ANOVA for the response surface quadratic model

Formula NAT-SLN formulations SD CV% Adequate precision for ANOVA Remarks
R-squared Adjusted R-squared Predicted R-squared
R1
 Linear model 0.9072 0.8857 0.8114 2.90
 2FI model 0.9253 0.8804 0.6400 2.79
 Quadratic model 0.9945 0.9875 0.9261 0.96 2.84 43.500 Suggested
 Cubic model 0.9991 0.9963 0.52 Aliased
R2
 Linear model 0.7989 0.7525 0.6399 3.03
 2FI model 0.98054 0.6886 0.2527 3.39
 Quadratic model 0.9744 0.9414 0.9120 1.47 6.66 18.249 Suggested
 Cubic model 0.9777 0.9107 1.82 Aliased
R3
 Linear model 0.9157 0.8984 0.8348 3.95
 2FI model 0.9684 0.9495 0.8695 2.87
 Quadratic model 0.9901 0.9774 0.8461 1.86 2.93 32.245 Suggested
 Cubic model 0.9997 0.9988 0.43 Aliased

Note: Underlined entries refer to “the best fit model terms”.

Abbreviation: CV%, coefficient of variation.