Item | Study ID |
Study author | Chlup 2009 |
Brief name | Buccal vs oral administration |
Recipient | Healthy volunteers |
Why | To assess the efficacy of different commercially available glucose products on the evolution of plasma glucose concentration |
What (materials) | I: glucose spray, manufacturer not mentioned C: dextrose tablet (6 g) |
What (procedures) | The glucose product (intervention or comparator) was administered after an average fasting time of 8 to 9 hours (range was 6 to 13 hours). Plasma glucose concentration was measured, and the glucose product was administered immediately after the first measurement. Each intervention was administered 3 times (on separate days, following fasting) |
Who provided | Researcher, no further information available |
How (mode of delivery; individual or group) | I: spray doses applied on the mucosa of the cheek, without swallowing C: chewing and consumption of the tablet |
Where | Experimental setting |
When and how much | I: 10 glucose spray doses (5 doses per cheek); one single administration C: one dextrose tablet (6 g); one single administration |
Tailoring | NA |
Modification of intervention throughout the study | NA |
Strategies to improve or maintain intervention fidelity | NA |
Extent of intervention fidelity | NA |
Study author | Barennes 2005 |
Brief name | Sublingual vs oral administration |
Recipient | Children 1‐15 years with moderate symptoms of malaria or respiratory tract infections and low blood glucose concentrations |
Why | To compare different forms of glucose administration to relieve hypoglycaemia |
What (materials) | I: wet sugar C: sugar |
What (procedures) | Glucose was given in the morning, after fasting overnight (starting after dinner) |
Who provided | Physician |
How (mode of delivery; individual or group) | I: wet sugar was applied under the tongue without swallowing C: sugar on the tongue, swallowed |
Where | Hamdallaye Health Center |
When and how much | 2.5 g of sugar (intervention or comparator) was administered in intervention and comparator group |
Tailoring | NA |
Modification of intervention throughout the study | NA |
Strategies to improve or maintain intervention fidelity | NA |
Extent of intervention fidelity | NA |
Study author | Slama 1990 |
Brief name | Dextrose gel vs oral administration |
Recipient | Participants with insulin‐dependent diabetes |
Why | To evaluate the efficacy of different forms of sugar in correcting the hypoglycaemic reactions of insulin‐treated diabetic patients |
What (materials) | I: 15 g of glucose in the form of 40 g of a 40% dextrose gel (Hypostop, Novo Industries)
C1: glucose tablet (15 g) (Glucose Tablets, Becton Dickinson)
C2: a solution of 15 g of glucose in 150 mL of water C1 and C2 were combined as one "oral group" in the data analyses |
What (procedures) | See above |
Who provided | Not reported, but probably a physician (hospital setting) |
How (mode of delivery; individual or group) | I: not described how the gel was applied, but should be applied to the cheek according to the manufacturer C1: swallowed without water C2: swallowed |
Where | Hospital |
When and how much | I: 15 g C1: 1 tablet (15 g) C2: 15 g of glucose in 150 mL water |
Tailoring | NA |
Modification of intervention throughout the study | NA |
Strategies to improve or maintain intervention fidelity | NA |
Extent of intervention fidelity | NA |
Study author | Gunning 1978 |
Brief name | Buccal vs oral administration |
Recipient | Healthy volunteers |
Why | To evaluate the efficacy of instant glucose by studying the absorption of this preparation in normal volunteers |
What (materials) | Instant glucose containing 50 µCi of 2‐tritiated glucose |
What (procedures) | At 8 AM after an overnight fast, an indwelling intravenous cannula was inserted into an antecubital vein. After a 30‐minute rest period, two initial blood samples were obtained, following which 15 g of instant glucose was administered. Blood samples were analysed for glucose using fluorometric enzymatic techniques |
Who provided | Researcher, no further information available |
How (mode of delivery; individual or group) | I: glucose was placed between the teeth and cheek of each subject. Participants were encouraged not to swallow C: glucose was swallowed |
Where | Experimental setting |
When and how much | 15 g of labelled instant glucose was administered in intervention and comparator group |
Tailoring | NA |
Modification of intervention throughout the study | NA |
Strategies to improve or maintain intervention fidelity | NA |
Extent of intervention fidelity | NA |
—: denotes not reported C: comparator; g: gram; I: intervention; NA: not applicable; µCi: micro Curie; mL: millilitre |