Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuropsychologia. 2019 Feb 25;127:171–184. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.02.018

Table 3.

Summary of the psycholinguistic properties of the second word in each condition; the first word is identical across all conditions.

Identical
 Similar Place-Manner
 Similar Voice-Manner
 Different
M SD M SD M SD M SD
Syll freqa 1.23 0.75 1.59 0.70 1.85 0.80 1.84 0.44
CELEX logb 0.86 0.65 1.54 0.67 1.22 0.81 1.61 0.36
SLBFc 9.69 0.31 9.73 0.47 9.57 0.68 9.73 0.66
MLBFd 3.23 0.10 3.24 0.16 3.19 0.23 3.24 0.22
SLBPFe 5.41 0.77 5.56 0.52 5.69 0.47 5.86 0.58
MLBPFf 2.70 0.39 2.78 0.26 2.84 0.24 2.93 0.29
Ng 15.66 1.97 12.66 2.73 13.66 3.61 12.33 1.63
PNh 27.66 5.85 26.50 7.23 27.00 4.81 29.33 5.20
Freq Ni 87.73 49.36 120.00 134.76 78.76 72.66 103.61 74.10
a

Log Syllable frequency regardless of word position and (Baayen etal., 1995).

b

log total CELEX word frequency (Baayen et al., 1995).

c

summed log bigram frequency (Davis, 2005).

d

mean log bigram frequency (Davis, 2005).

e

summed log biphone frequency (Davis, 2005).

f

mean log biphone frequency (Davis, 2005).

g

orthographic neighborhood size (Davis, 2005).

h

phonological neighborhood (Davis, 2005).

i

frequency of orthographic neighbors (Davis, 2005).