Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 2;316(3):E383–E396. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00401.2018

Table 5.

PLS-DA model performance for 2-class models fit with untargeted metabolomics of primary metabolism

Full Model
Reduced Model
Fluid n Metabolites* LV CV Acc. P Value§ Metabolites LV CV Acc. P Value
BMI classifiers (NW vs. OW)
Follicular fluid 16 295 2 100% <0.01 10 3 100% <0.01
Serum 17 295 3 100% <0.01 11 2 100% <0.01
% Body fat classifiers (NW vs. OW)
Follicular fluid 16 295 1 100% <0.01 26 1 100% <0.01
Serum 17 295 1 76.4% 0.05 29 1 94.4% <0.01

Samples assessed by gas chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Normal weight (NW) and overweight (OW): n = 8 for follicular fluid; NW: n = 9 and OW: n = 8 for serum. Acc, accuracy; CV, cross-validation; LV, latent variable; PLS-DA, partial least squares-discriminant analysis.

*

No. of metabolites used to fit PLS-DA model.

No. of LVs needed to reach highest CV accuracy.

Mean out-of-bag classification accuracy of 6-fold CV.

§

Proportion of permuted (100 permutations) mean CV accuracy less than actual mean CV accuracy.