Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 2;316(3):R222–R234. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00304.2018

Table 3.

Vmax and Km values for Nile tilapia and rainbow trout

Nile Tilapia
Rainbow Trout
Tilapia (Vmax)/Trout (Vmax), % Tissue Vmax, µA/cm2 Km, mM Tissue Vmax, µA/cm2 Km, mM
Proximal 47.0 ± 6.7 4.2 ± 0.7 Pyloric ceca 2.3 ± 0.4a,b 4.2 ± 1.0a 2,043d
Midintestine 59.6 ± 7.0 6.0 ± 1.0 Midgut 1.7 ± 0.3a 1.8 ± 0.3b 3,506d
Hindgut 56.2 ± 9.3 5.7 ± 1.1 Hindgut 2.4 ± 0.2b 12.3 ± 1.6c 2,342d

Values are means ± SE. Maximal velocity (Vmax; µA/cm2) and Michaelis-Menten constant (Km; mM) are represented for each tissue type in Nile tilapia and rainbow trout. Area of intestinal segment was 0.3 cm2. There were no significant differences in Vmax and Km values between tissues for tilapia. In trout, significant differences between Vmax values are as follows:

a

pyloric ceca vs.

b

hindgut, and a midgut vs. bhindgut, with no significant differences between pyloric ceca and midgut (Tukey’s test after one-way ANOVA, P < 0.05). Significant differences between Km values in trout are as follow: apyloric ceca vs. bmidgut, apyloric ceca vs.

c

hindgut, and bmidgut vs. chindgut (Tukey’s test after one-way ANOVA, P < 0.05).

d

Significant Vmax values between tilapia and trout (Student’s t-test, P < 0.05).