Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Adm Policy Ment Health. 2019 May;46(3):298–310. doi: 10.1007/s10488-018-0914-6

Table 2.

Stakeholders ‘ Ranking of Peer Characteristics Overall

Peer Staff
Characteristics		 Intervention
Participants
(n= 28)		 Peer-specialists
(n = 4)		 Supervisors
(n = 9)		 Total
(n = 41)
N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%)
Comfortable 13 (44%) 2 (50%) 4 (44%) 19 (46%)
Commonality 4 (15%) 2 (50%) 0 (0%) 6 (15%)
Trust 5 (19%) 0 (0%) 3 (33%) 8 (20%)
Self-Disclosure 6 (22%) 2 (50%) 2 (22%) 10 (24%)
Respected Decisions 6 (22%) 3 (75%) 0 (0%) 9 (22%)
Empathy 6 (22%) 0 (0%) 4 (44%) 10 (24%)
Support 11 (41%) 1 (25%) 5 (56%) 16 (39%)
Credibility 9 (33%) 0 (0%) 2 (22%) 11 (27%)
Hope 13 (44%) 1 (25%) 3 (33%) 16 (39%)
Modeling 8 (26%) 0 (0%) 1 (11%) 9 (22%)
Translation 6 (22%) 1 (25%) 3 (33%) 10 (24%)