Table 3:
Follow-up knowledge and intention across four treatment arms.
| Knowledgea | Intention for Screeningb | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cervical Cancer Risk | Cervical Screening | HPV Risk | Cervical Screening | |
| Fotonovela | 97.1 (1.9) | 36.4 (4.3) | 81.7 (2.6) | 92.5 (4.0) |
| Radionovela | 99.2 (1.2) | 32.9 (5.7) | 68.0 (2.4) | 98.5 (1.8) |
| Digital Story | 97.5 (1.7) | 23.8 (4.9) | 83.6 (2.4) | 90.2 (3.3) |
| Control | 85.5 (4.2 ) | 13.7 (3.3) | 56.5 (2.4) | 98.5 (1.7) |
| P valuesc | ||||
| For comparison of 4 treatment arms | 0.02 | 0.0003 | <0.0001 | 0.06 |
| For comparison of 3 intervention armsd | 0.57 | 0.16 | <0.0001 | -- |
a
Knowledge at follow-up is computed as the mean average of correct responses to survey items adjusted for baseline knowledge, age, and primary language spoken.
b
Intention at follow-up is computed as the mean average of endorsing responses to survey items adjusted for baseline intention, age, and primary language spoken.
c
Wald test for equality of means
d
Differences in means of three intervention arms only tested if statistically significant difference in four treatment arms.