Table 2.
Comparison of three centrality measures of all hub regions.
| Hub regions | F–value | P–value | CD,node (Mean ± SD) | CB,node (Mean ± SD) | CP,node (Mean ± SD) | Post-hoc test |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PreCG.L | 18.335 | <0.0001† | 0.746 ± 0.027 | 1.148 ± 0.063 | 1.021 ± 0.047 | CD,node < CB,node, CD,node < CP,node |
| PreCG.R | 4.421 | 0.012† | 0.977 ± 0.026 | 1.085 ± 0.061 | 1.172 ± 0.045 | CD,node < CP,node |
| SFGdor.L | 5.04 | 0.007† | 0.88 ± 0.026 | 1.009 ± 0.057 | 1.075 ± 0.044 | CD,node < CP,node |
| SFGdor.R | 27.296 | <0.0001† | 1.308 ± 0.028 | 1.845 ± 0.073 | 1.733 ± 0.053 | CD,node < CB,node, CD,node < CP,node |
| SFGmed.L | 5.25 | 0.005† | 0.869 ± 0.029 | 1.009 ± 0.061 | 1.083 ± 0.047 | CD,node < CP,node |
| ACG.L | 30.478 | <0.0001† | 0.625 ± 0.027 | 1.17 ± 0.069 | 1.057 ± 0.052 | CD,node < CB,node, CD,node < CP,node |
| CAL.R | 84.506 | <0.0001† | 1.242 ± 0.027 | 0.528 ± 0.048 | 0.885 ± 0.039 | CD,node > CP,node > CB,node |
| MOG.L | 0.653 | 0.521 | 1.297 ± 0.031 | 1.25 ± 0.07 | 1.337 ± 0.053 | |
| PoCG.L | 32.036 | <0.0001† | 1.098 ± 0.029 | 1.701 ± 0.079 | 1.673 ± 0.061 | CD,node < CB,node, CD,node < CP,node |
| PoCG.R | 18.087 | <0.0001† | 1.238 ± 0.027 | 1.606 ± 0.071 | 1.653 ± 0.053 | CD,node < CB,node, CD,node < CP,node |
| PCUN.L | 8.408 | <0.0001† | 2.083 ± 0.024 | 1.776 ± 0.078 | 2.028 ± 0.055 | CD,node > CB,node, CB,node < CP,node |
| PCUN.R | 19.892 | <0.0001† | 2.074 ± 0.025 | 1.626 ± 0.068 | 1.842 ± 0.048 | CD,node > CP,node > CB,node |
| MTG.L | 48.873 | <0.0001† | 1.217 ± 0.029 | 0.544 ± 0.06 | 0.948 ± 0.051 | CD,node > CP,node > CB,node |
| MTG.R | 156.231 | <0.0001† | 1.113 ± 0.024 | 0.191 ± 0.045 | 0.622 ± 0.038 | CD,node > CP,node > CB,node |
An ANOVA test was performed to determine significant differences among Z-transformed centrality measures (CD,node, CB,node, and CP,node) at all 78 network nodes. Values of P < 0.05 were accepted as significant with Bonferroni post-hoc correction. †FDR corrected P < 0.05.