Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 5;10:213. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00213

Table 2.

Multiple regression analyses.

Emotional empathy
Δ MET Emotional empathy
Theory-of-Mind
Δ MASC total errors
Social interaction
Δ SDM composite score
Social network
Δ SNQ network size
Personality disorder
Δ SCID-II Cluster B
B SE β B SE β B SE β B SE β B SE β
Constant 1.55 1.14 −1.85 2.02 −0.26 0.45 −0.73 2.72 −1.01 2.80
Age 0.04 0.03 0.14 0.06 0.05 0.14 −0.01 0.01 −0.08 −0.04 0.06 −0.08 0.02 0.06 0.04
Sex −1.16 0.50 −0.25* −0.99 0.86 −0.12 0.09 0.20 0.05 −0.56 1.20 −0.05 −0.71 1.23 −0.06
ADHD-SR score −0.05 0.03 −0.16 −0.07 0.06 −0.14 0.00 0.01 −0.01 0.04 0.08 0.05 −0.24 0.08 −0.32**
Controls vs. cocaine increaser −0.26 0.59 −0.05 1.71 1.03 0.20 0.03 0.24 0.01 0.35 1.43 0.03 4.00 1.49 0.31**
Cocaine decreaser vs. cocaine increaser −1.30 0.66 −0.25* −0.51 1.17 −0.06 −0.31 0.27 −0.16 0.54 1.63 0.05 4.43 1.69 0.34**
R2 0.14 0.10 0.03 0.01 0.17
F 2.68* 1.67 0.57 0.22 3.25**

Multiple linear regression with the independent variables age, sex, ADHS-SR score, and dummy coded (zero, one) group variables. To compare the groups, cocaine increaser acted as the reference group. Dependent variables are change values (Δ = value at t2 − value at t1).

B, unstandardized regression coefficient; SE, unstandardized standard error; β, standardized beta.

(*)p < .10; *p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001.