Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 30;28(5):941–951. doi: 10.1002/pro.3604

Table 1.

Ability of Additives to Protect LDH and Some of Their Physical Properties

Additive g/L for 50% activity Mole ratio for 50% activity pI MW (kDa) # residues Hphoba Hphoba density Charge at pH 7 Sequence charge density, pH 7 Surface hydrophobicity59
BSA 6.4 130 4.8 66 583 −279.2 −0.48 −13.9 −0.024 0.545
CAHS D 4.0 220 6.0 25.5 227 −223.5 −0.99 −3.1 −0.014 n/db
CAHS G 3.6 110 5.9 45.5 414 −341.5 −0.82 −5.1 −0.012 n/db
SH3 2.3 460 4.8 6.8 59 −85.8 −0.95 −5.6 −0.095 0.596
FlgM 1.4 180 9.1 10.6 97 −59.8 −0.62 1.9 0.020 n/db
Ubiquitinc 0.84 140 8.5 10.4 90 −85.8 −0.95 2.4 0.027 0.491
Lysozyme n/dd n/dd 9.0 14.3 129 −60.9 −0.47 7.9 0.061 0.471
LDH – 1e n/af n/af 6.0 147 1336 −186.6 −0.002 −18 −0.013 n/af
LDH – 2e n/af n/af 6.5 146 1334 −347.4 0.011 −9 −0.007 n/af
LPL n/af n/af 8.5 107 956 −499.8 −0.15 11 0.012 n/ab , f
a

Hphob, Kyte, and Doolittle hydrophobicity.60

b

n/d, not determined because there is no PDB.

c

Calculations account for His tag.58, 61

d

n/d, not determined because lysozyme inactivates LDH in solution.

e

Isozymes LDH – 1 and LDH – 2 are both present in commercial LDH.

f

n/a, not applicable because these are test enzymes, not additives.