Table 4.
Qualitative analysis
| ss-DTI | rs-DTI | ss-DTI vs. rs-DTI | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | P-value | |
| Reader 1 | |||||
| Distortion artifacts | 3.4 | 0.663 | 2.3 | 0.458 | 0.001 |
| Ghosting/Motion artifacts | 2.5 | 0.5 | 3.0 | 0.572 | 0.121 |
| Resolution | 2.7 | 0.458 | 2.4 | 0.490 | 0.196 |
| Overall image quality | 3.2 | 0.6 | 2.3 | 0.458 | 0.002 |
| Reader 2 | |||||
| Distortion artifacts | 3.5 | 0.671 | 2.5 | 0.5 | 0.002 |
| Ghosting/Motion artifacts | 2.5 | 0.500 | 2.8 | 0.6 | 0.264 |
| Resolution | 2.8 | 0.748 | 2.5 | 0.5 | 0.331 |
| Overall image quality | 3.3 | 0.458 | 2.2 | 0.4 | 0.001 |
Grading of distortion artifacts, ghosting/motion artifacts, resolution and overall image quality is provided for each sequence and reader as mean ± SD on a 5-point Likert scale (artifacts: 1, none; 2, low; 3, moderate; 4, high; 5, very high; overall image quality: 1, excellent; 2, good; 3, moderate; 4, poor; 5, non-diagnostic). Paired t-tests were performed to assess potential group differences. Corresponding P-values are given. Italics indicate statistical significance.