Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 26;122(4):468–484. doi: 10.1038/s41437-018-0146-2

Table 2.

Results from linear models of factors influencing microsatellite and major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I genetic diversity of insular populations of L. trilineata

Marker type Predicted variable Factors Estimate t value P-value
Microsatellite Ar Size 0.37 0.47 0.653
Distance −0.84 −1.30 0.241
Microsatellite H o Size 0.005 0.09 0.929
Distance −0.11 −2.63 0.04
Microsatellite H e Size −0.03 −0.62 0.555
Distance −0.10 −2.55 0.044
MHC MHCAR Size 0.01 3.75 0.009
Distance −0.02 −2.50 0.046
MHC NaI Size 0.25 0.45 0.671
Distance −0.27 −0.60 0.570
MHC π Size 0.02 1.40 0.211
Distance 0.001 −0.06 0.952
MHC D Size 0.02 0.95 0.377
Distance −0.001 −0.05 0.959

Populations were used as random effects. We use the size of island (log-transformed) and the distance from the continent (log-transformed) as fixed effects. P-values < 0.05 are in bold

Ar microsatellite allele richness, Ho observed heterozygosity, He expected heterozygosity, MHCAR MHC allelic richness, NaI average number of MHC alleles per individual, π average MHC nucleotide diversity, D average MHC diversity between amino-acid variants