Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 6;2:3. doi: 10.1186/s41512-018-0025-6

Table 2.

Univariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses

Hazard ratio (95% CI) p value
A. CPR derivation
1. Study design 0.9409
 Cohort 0.96 (0.29–3.17)
 Case-control 1
2. Geographic location 0.0002
 USA 4.15 (1.89–9.13)
 Other 1
3. Log10(sample size) 2.32 (1.37–3.91) 0.0035
4. Number of predictors 1.01 (0.92–1.12) 0.7833
5. Presentation format 0.1095
 User-friendly 1.82 (0.88–3.79)
 Not user-friendly 1
6. Validation in derivation 0.0257
 External 0.19 (0.03–1.42)
 Internal 1.73 (0.77–3.90)
 None 1
B. Reporting and publication
1. Description of participants 0.3853
 Clear 1.39 (0.66–2.94)
 Unclear 1
2. Description of predictors 0.2269
 Clear 0.63 (0.30–1.34)
 Unclear 1
3. Description of outcomes 0.3282
 Clear 0.67 (0.30–1.52)
 Unclear 1
4. Performance measure 0.9360
 Reported 1.03 (0.48–2.20)
 Not reported 1
5. Information for risk calculation 0.0289
 Reported 2.65 (1.01–6.96)
 Not reported 1
6. Impact factor 1.06 (1.03–1.09) 0.0002