Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 25;2016(10):CD008367. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008367.pub3

Koeman 2006.

Methods Study design: A multicentre randomised double‐blind placebo‐controlled trial with 3 parallel groups
Location: 2 university hospitals and 3 general hospitals in the Netherlands
Number of centres: 5 hospitals (2 surgical and 5 mixed ICUs)
Study period: February 2001 to March 2003
Funding source: ZONMw Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (project number 2200.0046)
Participants Inclusion criteria: Consecutive adult patients (> 18 years of age) needing mechanical ventilation for at least 48 hours were included within 24 hours after intubation and start of mechanical ventilation
Exclusion criteria: A pre‐admission immunocompromised status, pregnancy, and if the physical condition did not allow oral application of study medication
Age group: Not stated
Number randomised: 385
Number evaluated: 379
Group A: Chlorhexidine group: n = 127; mean age: 60.9 ± 15.3; M/F: 71/57; APACHE II: 22.2 ± 7.02
Group B: Chlorhexidine/COL group: n = 128; mean age: 62.4 ± 19.1; M/F: 66/61; APACHE II: 23.7 ± 7.38
Group C: Control group: n = 130; mean age: 62.1 ± 15.9; M/F: 93/37; APACHE II: 21.8 ± 7.43
Interventions Comparison: Chlorhexidine (in petroleum jelly) versus petroleum jelly alone
Group A: Chlorhexidine group (n = 127): Oral decontamination with chlorhexidine (2%) in Vaseline petroleum jelly
Group B: Chlorhexidine/COL group (n = 128): Oral decontamination with chlorhexidine plus colistin antibiotic chlorhexidine/colistin (CHX/COL 2%/2%) in Vaseline petroleum jelly
Group C: Control (n = 130): Oral decontamination with Vaseline petroleum jelly
Trial medication was administered 4 times daily, after removing remnants of the previous dose with a gauze moistened with saline. Approximately 2 cm of paste, approximately 0.5 g, was put on a gloved fingertip and administered to each side of the buccal cavity
Outcomes The following outcome variables were reported for each group:
1. Incidence of VAP
2. Incidence of early onset VAP
3. Days ventilated (mean ± SD)
4. ICU stay (mean ± SD)
5. Days in hospital after ICU discharge (mean ± SD)
6. Changes of endotracheal colonisation through cultures in 3 time windows after ventilation, 1 ‐ 3 days, 5 ‐ 8 days and 9 ‐ 12 days respectively
Notes Sample size calculation: Reported in paper together with planned sequential analysis
Only Group A and Group C included in this review
Email sent to author 26 August 2016 requesting mortality data but failed due to invalid email address
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk "...randomly assigned to one of three study groups by computerised randomisation schedule. Randomization was stratified by hospital"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk The interventions were produced by an independent unit and we considered allocation was concealed from the research team.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Double blind, placebo controlled
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Double blind, placebo controlled
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk The study was discontinued in 6 participants, 5 participants withdrew consent, 1 due to adverse event. Intention‐to‐treat analysis included all participants for primary outcome
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All planned outcomes reported
Other bias Low risk Unlikely