Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 14;2016(10):CD001001. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001001.pub3

NETT 2003.

Methods Randomised controlled trial
 Method of randomisation: computer‐generated random number sequence
 Allocation concealment: adequate
 Outcome assessor blinding: not described
Participants Screened: 3777
 Randomised: 1218 (LVRS 608; control 610)
 Mean age in years: 66.6
 Emphysema: heterogeneous and homogenous
 Diagnosis: CT scan
 Entry criteria: FEV1 ≤ 45 % predicted (≥ 15 % predicted among participants ≥ 70 years of age); TLC ≥ 100% predicted; RV ≥ 150% predicted; partial pressure of resting arterial carbon dioxide ≤ 60 mmHg; resting partial pressure of arterial oxygen ≥ 45 mmHg; ability to walk ≥ 140 metres in 6 minutes; ability to complete 3 minutes on a bicycle ergometer; abstinence from smoking for 6 months before randomisation
Exclusion criteria: concurrent medical conditions precluding surgery or that might interrupt follow‐up
SGRQ total score in units (SD): 52.5 (12.6) for LVRS vs 53.6 (12.7) for control
 6MWD in metres (SD): 370.78 (95.28) for LVRS vs 377.55 (96.32) for control
FEV1 in % predicted (SD): 26.8 (7.4) for LVRS vs 26.7 (7.0) for control
RV in % predicted (SD): 220.5 (49.9) for LVRS vs 223.4 (48.9) for control
TLC in % predicted (SD): 128 (15.3) for LVRS vs 128.5 (15.0) for control
PaO2 in mmHg: 64.5 for LVRS vs 64.2 for control
 PaCO2 in mmHg: 43.3 for LVRS vs 43.0 for control
DLCO in % predicted: 28.3 for laser vs 28.4 for control
Interventions LVRS via VATS or MS vs usual medical care according to ATS recommendations
Usual care tailored to each participant in the control group included smoking cessation (for those resuming smoking during course of the study); drug therapies (including CS and inhaled bronchodilators); LTOT; immunisations; and continued pulmonary rehabilitation.
Pulmonary rehabilitation: 3 phases: prerandomisation (6 to 10 weeks); post randomisation: 8 to 9 weeks) and long‐term maintenance (duration of the trial). PR consisted of physical, educational and psychosocial components (including nutritional counselling). Offered to both treatment groups
Outcomes Mortality; exercise capacity; quality of life; FEV1; FVC; RV; cost; complications; length of hospital stay
Notes Funding received by National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Randomisation mentioned but methods not described
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Study is indicated to be unmasked
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No mention of blinding for outcome assessors
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Methods of handling outcome data missing from questionnaires (if any) not described
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Prespecified published protocol is not available for comparison, but rationale behind the trial is published.
Other bias Low risk No other biases identified