Table 2. Different CNV patterns occur in ccRCC samples (n=528).
| Diploid | Deep deletion | Shallow deletion | Copy number gain | Amplification | CNV sum | Percentage | ||
| Eraser | ALKBH5 | 457 | 0 | 45 | 26 | 0 | 71 | 13.45% |
| FTO | 408 | 0 | 22 | 98 | 0 | 120 | 22.73% | |
| Writer | METTL14 | 439 | 3 | 74 | 11 | 1 | 89 | 16.86% |
| METTL3 | 303 | 0 | 207 | 18 | 0 | 225 | 42.61% | |
| WTAP | 369 | 1 | 150 | 8 | 0 | 159 | 30.11% | |
| Reader | YTHDF1 | 408 | 0 | 0 | 119 | 1 | 120 | 22.73% |
| YTHDF2 | 424 | 0 | 95 | 9 | 0 | 104 | 19.70% | |
| YTHDC1 | 448 | 0 | 65 | 14 | 1 | 80 | 15.15% | |
| YTHDC2 | 237 | 1 | 7 | 230 | 53 | 291 | 55.11% | |
| YTHDF3 | 391 | 1 | 72 | 61 | 3 | 137 | 25.95% | |
| TP53 | 451 | 2 | 50 | 25 | 0 | 77 | 14.58% | |
| VHL | 58 | 58 | 405 | 7 | 0 | 470 | 89.02% |