Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 15;2016(10):CD012382. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012382

Weber 1980.

Methods RCT; double blind
Participants 59 inpatients (32 male, 27 female), aged 16 to 69 years
Inclusion criteria: acute and subacute sciatica, admitted consecutively to a hospital. Clinical symptoms and signs due to fifth lumbar and/or first sacral root lesion.
Exclusion: Patients with indication for immediate surgical intervention; contraindication to NSAIDs, previous history of dyspepsia or tuberculosis
Interventions Treatment started on day 2 of admission. Treatment duration 5 days. Follow‐up duration 5 days (?)
(i) NSAID group: Butazolidin Alka 200 mg TID for 3 days, 100 mg TID for 2 days
(ii) Placebo group: administered as in group (i)
Outcomes Pain: Not reported.
Disability: Not reported.
Global improvement: Global effect as definite positive effect or indefinite at day 5; immediate result showed a trend in pain relief in favour of the NSAID group, but not significantly: 14/27 and 8/30 scored a definite positive effect. No difference in straight leg raise test following treatment.
Additional drug use: Additional drugs were given on request: paracetamol, codeine, and promethazine. The use of additional drugs was not recorded.
Other outcomes: None.
Adverse effects: No side effects reported.
Notes Withdrawal: 2 participants were excluded from the trial (1 male, 1 female) because they withheld information on contraindications
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not reported
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Outcome not reported for all participants (reported for 30 and 27 out of 59 included participants)
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All outcomes defined in the methods section were reported
Group similarity at baseline Unclear risk Limited information on baseline characteristics presented
Influence of co‐interventions Low risk Use of additional analgesics reported
Compliance with interventions Unclear risk Not addressed
Funding Unclear risk Not reported
Other bias Unclear risk Small trial, numbers without standard deviation or confidence intervals reported