Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 15;2016(10):CD012382. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012382

Weber 1993.

Methods RCT; double‐blinded
Participants 214 outpatients, mean age 48 years (range 18 to 75 years)
Inclusion criteria: radiating pain corresponding to L5/S1 root syndrome with/without sensory and/or motor deficits; positive straight leg raise test; radiating pain provoked by finger pressure; free from sciatica the previous 6 months.
Exclusion criteria: cauda equina syndrome; "acute back"; progressive paresis; suspected tumour or local inflammation; ankylosing spondylitis; rheumatoid arthritis; history of peptic ulcer or severe dyspepsia; hypersensitivity to aspirin or other NSAIDs; any other known hematologic, hepatic, renal, pulmonary, cardiac, or systemic disease. Patients with severe psychiatric disease, drug addiction, or alcoholism were excluded
Interventions Treatment duration 14 days. Follow‐up duration 2 and 4 weeks, 12 months. No results reported for the respective treatment groups at 12 months.
(i) NSAID group: piroxicam 20 mg day 1 to 2, 2 tablets OD; day 3 to 14, 1 tablet OD
(ii) Placebo group: administered as in group (i)
Outcomes Pain: Marked reduction in pain (VAS 0 to 100) at 14 days and 4 weeks compared to baseline in both groups, but no significant difference between groups.
Disability: Marked improved function (modified Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire 0 to 17) at 14 days and 4 weeks compared to baseline in both groups, but no significant difference between groups.
Global improvement: No.
Additional drug use: Additional analgesics as needed included paracetamol with or without codeine and/or levomepromazine. No other opioids were allowed.
Other outcomes: At 4 weeks return to work 60%, at 12 months 92.5%. The mean duration of sick leave was 27.9 days. 62 participants were not sick‐listed at all.
Adverse effects: 35 participants reported mainly mild to moderate side effects (22 in the piroxicam group, 13 in the placebo group)
Notes Withdrawal: 6 participants were dropped out at 4 weeks
Funding: Pfizer A/S Norway provided piroxicam and placebo
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported, design was double blind
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Placebo capsules of identical appearance were administered in the same manner as the active substance
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not reported how blinding was maintained throughout the trial
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No reporting on drop‐out or ITT analysis
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All outcomes defined in the methods section were reported
Group similarity at baseline Unclear risk Limited information on baseline characteristics reported
Influence of co‐interventions Low risk Additional analgesic use did not differ between the groups
Compliance with interventions Low risk Compliance 95% (piroxicam) and 98% (placebo) up until week 2
Funding Unclear risk Pfizer A/S Norway provided piroxicam and placebo
Other bias Unclear risk Good sample size, did not report standard deviation and confidence interval

BID: 2 times a day
 ITT: intention to treat
 LBP: low back pain
 LOCF: last observation carried forward
 NSAID: non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drug
 OD: once a day
 RCT: randomised controlled trial
 SD: standard deviation
 TID: 3 times a day
 VAS: visual analogue scale