Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 12;14(4):e0214816. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214816

Table 2. Functional annotation of genes with a CpG at TSS position −1.

Term # Genes % Genes q–value
1. Phosphoprotein 1110 52.0 3.5 ⋅ 10−13
2. Acetylation 507 23.7 2.1 ⋅ 10−9
3. Alternative splicing 1314 61.5 1.6 ⋅ 10−8
4. Cytoplasm 658 30.8 2.7 ⋅ 10−8
5. Nucleoplasm 412 19.3 7.2 ⋅ 10−7
6. Protein binding 1134 53.1 2.6 ⋅ 10−6
7. Protein transport 112 5.2 5.5 ⋅ 10−6
8. Nucleus 668 31.3 8.3 ⋅ 10−5
9. Vesicle–mediated transport 39 1.8 1.9 ⋅ 10−2
10. Cytoskeleton 177 8.3 8.6 ⋅ 10−4
11. Rab GTPase binding 34 1.6 1.0 ⋅ 10−2
12. Endocytosis 52 2.4 4.1 ⋅ 10−3
13. Cytosol 450 21.1 6.0 ⋅ 10−3
14. Guanine–nucleotide releasing factor 35 1.6 2.1 ⋅ 10−3
15. Cell cycle 106 5.0 3.0 ⋅ 10−3
16. Mitochondrion 162 7.6 4.1 ⋅ 10−3
17. Transport 271 12.7 1.4 ⋅ 10−2
18. Cell division 68 3.2 1.5 ⋅ 10−2
19. Electron transport 24 1.1 1.4 ⋅ 10−2

DAVID functional annotation [48] was applied to the 2,136 RefSeq genes with a CpG dinucleotide at TSS position −1. Duplicated terms from different databases were deleted and the one with smallest p-value was retained. Shown are terms with adjusted p–value of p < 0.05 (Benjamini-Hochberg correction).