Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 12;14(4):e0215292. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215292

Table 4. Individual data of all study patients (n = 9).

Case Age (years) Sex Smoking status Types of EGFR mutation Prevoius treatmet lines before nivolumab EGFR-TKIs PD-L1 expression No. of CD4+ T cells (/mm2) N0. of CD8+ T cells (/mm2) No. of Foxp3+ T cells (/mm2) PS NLR Response to nivolumab PFS (days) OS (days)
1 37 F Never 19del. +T790M 5 G→E→A 0% 2882 156 44 1 2.4 PD 19 469
2 40 M Never 19del. 2 Gefitinib 100% 2248 978 8 1 1.96 PD 33 370
3 62 F Never 19del. 3 Gefitinib 0% 3452 434 22 1 1.96 PD 51 480
4 66 F Never 20 insertion 4 None 30–40% 5567 1405 874 1 1.51 PR 616 616
5 62 F Never 19del. 2 Afatinib 0% 951 1117 508 1 2.13 PD 51 355
6 72 M Former 19del. 2 Afatinib 0% 1548 236 227 1 2.17 PD 47 299
7 62 F Never L858R +T790M 3 Afatinib 5–9% 1502 373 11 0 9.875 NE 31 361
8 40 M Former S768I 2 None 0% 1942 1186 22 0 4.94 PD 7 44
9 62 F Never 19del. 1 Afatinib 1–4% 1407 309 54 1 3.44 PD 31 230

F, female; M, male; G, gefitinib; E, erlotinib; A, afatinib; PS, performancde status; NLR, netrophil to lymphocyte ratio; PFS, progression-free survival; OS, overall survival