Table 2.
Digital surveillance grade | Screen grade of other eye R0/1M0 n (%) |
R1M1 n (%) | R2/3MX n (%) |
---|---|---|---|
R0M0 | |||
OCT negative | 53 (10) | 8 (6) | 0 |
OCT borderline | 6 (1) | 0 | 0 |
OCT positive | 6 (1) | 0 | 0 |
R1M0 | |||
OCT negative | 156 (27) | 37 (28) | 0 |
OCT borderline | 25 (4) | 6 (5) | 0 |
OCT positive | 13 (2) | 3 (2) | 0 |
R1M1 | |||
OCT negative | 171 (30) | 45 (35) | 1 (50) |
OCT borderline | 77 (13) | 18 (14) | 0 |
OCT positive | 54 (9) | 13 (10) | 1 (50) |
R2/3MX | |||
OCT negative | 4 (1) | 0 | 0 |
OCT borderline | 2 (<1) | 0 | 0 |
OCT positive | 1 (<1) | 0 | 0 |
RUMX | |||
OCT negative | 2 (<1) | 0 | 0 |
OCT borderline | 1 (<1) | 0 | 0 |
OCT positive | 1 (<1) | 0 | 0 |
Total | 572 (100) | 130 (100)* | 2 (100) |
aResults per eye conditional on the screening grade of the other eye. MX: M0 or M1; RU: unknown retinopathy grade. For the 65 patients who were identified as having R1M1 in both eyes and had recorded SDOCT results the data has been reported for both eyes