Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 2;33(4):587–591. doi: 10.1038/s41433-018-0270-5

Table 2.

Comparison of image sharpness by field of view

Phase-plate adjustment Area On-axis Nasal Temporal Inferior Superior
Phase-plate adjustment Full 1.07 ± 0.03 1.09 ± 0.03 0.99 ± 0.04 1.09 ± 0.06 0.97 ± 0.03
Peripheral 0.99 ± 0.03 1.02 ± 0.03 0.93 ± 0.04 0.98 ± 0.05 0.88 ± 0.03
Full-peripheral difference (%) −7.0 ± 0.5 −6.9 ± 0.5 −6.0 ± 1.5 −10.5 ± 0.6 −10.0 ± 0.7
p-Value (full vs peripheral) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Without phase-plate adjustment Full 0.89 ± 0.05 0.90 ± 0.05 1.38 ± 0.08 0.94 ± 0.05 1.25 ± 0.06
Peripheral 0.613 ± 0.04 0.610 ± 0.04 1.124 ± 0.10 0.761 ± 0.05 1.083 ± 0.06
Full-peripheral difference (%) −31.8 ± 1.3 −32.7 ± 1.5 −20.7 ± 2.7 −20.2 ± 1.9 −14.2 ± 1.3
p-Value (full vs peripheral) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Increase in “Full-peripheral difference” phase-plate adjustment included (%) 25.1 ± 1.4 26.0 ± 1.5 15.6 ± 1.9 9.8 ± 1.8 4.2 ± 1.2
p-Value (full-peripheral difference, phase-plate vs without phase-plate <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001

Data presented as means or % ± standard error. p-Value was determined using t-test.