Skip to main content
. 2018 May 16;44(5):837–849. doi: 10.1038/s41386-018-0090-0

Table 2.

Heterogeneity and Publication bias.

Q p-value I2 (%)
Heterogeneity and inconsistency
MDD Complex I 549.160 0.000 91%
Complex IV 0.030 1.000 0%
BD Complex I 137,410.000 0.000 100%
Complex IV 873.150 0.000 95%
SZ Complex I 2197.500 0.000 97%
Complex IV 209.560 0.000 88%
AD Complex I 64,812.000 0.000 100%
Complex IV 4490.300 0.000 97%
PD Complex I 437.650 0.000 80%
Complex IV 3083.300 0.000 99%
AGING Complex I 27.934 0.218 18%
Complex IV 11.684 1.000 0%
Egger's regression
z-value df p-value
MDD Complex I −1.969 4 0.120
Complex IV 0.630 2 0.593
BD Complex I −2.191 17 0.043
Complex IV −0.042 8 0.968
SZ Complex I 0.135 13 0.895
Complex IV 1.035 8 0.331
AD Complex I −0.109 17 0.915
Complex IV −1.381 37 0.176
PD Complex I −2.127 30 0.042
Complex IV −0.176 26 0.862
AGING Complex I −1.025 9 0.332
Complex IV −2.820 13 0.014

(Top) Heterogeneity and Inconsistency. Significant Q statistics indicate the existence of heterogeneity A I2-value of 0% indicates no observed inconsistency; whereas larger values shows increasing inconsistency. (Bottom) Egger's regression test for . The existence of potential publication bias is indicated by p-values <0.05

df degrees of freedom