Table 1. System Usability Scale .
| Quantitative Data: System Usability Scale | ||||
| Item | Mean (SD) | No. (%) | ||
| Disagree | Neutral | Agree | ||
| a. Thought the Frailty Portal was easy to use | 3.7 (0.95) | 1 (14.3) | 1 (14.3) | 5 (71.4) |
| b. Found the Frailty Portal unnecessarily complex | 2.3 (0.89) | 4 (50.0) | 4 (50.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| c. Would like to use the Frailty Portal frequently | 3.6 (1.01) | 1 (11.1) | 4 (44.4) | 4 (44.4) |
| d. Would need the support of a technical person to be able to use the portal better | 3 (1.73) | 3 (42.9) | 1 (14.3) | 3 (42.9) |
| e. Found the various functions in the Frailty Portal were well integrated | 3.6 (0.92) | 1 (12.5) | 2 (25.0) | 5 (62.5) |
| f. Thought there was too much inconsistency in the Frailty Portal | 2.1 (1.46) | 5 (71.4) | 1 (14.3) | 1 (14.3) |
| g. Would imagine that most people would learn to use the portal very quickly | 3.4 (0.92) | 1 (12.5) | 4 (50.0) | 3 (37.5) |
| h. Found the Frailty Portal very cumbersome to use | 2.9 (0.90) | 3 (42.9) | 2 (28.6) | 2 (28.6) |
| i. Felt very confident using the Frailty Portal | 3.1 (0.83) | 2 (25.0) | 3 (37.5) | 3 (37.5) |
| j. Needed to learn a lot of things before I could get going with the Frailty Portal | 3 (1.07) | 3 (37.5) | 3 (37.5) | 2 (25.0) |
Abbreviation: SD, standard deviation.
Note: Two respondents provided their overall impression but could not respond to all items having not made full use of the tool. Scores ranged from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). However due to a limited sample size they were collapsed as Disagree (1, 2) or Agree (4, 5).