Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Br J Dermatol. 2018 Dec 5;180(5):1183–1189. doi: 10.1111/bjd.17312

Table 3.

Comparison between relapse and non-relapse patients in a subgroup of 27 paediatric LS patients who completed the recommended course of systemic therapy (>2 years)

Characteristics Relapse
(n=11)
No Relapse
(n=16)
Gender n (%) n (%) p-value2
    Female 8 (73) 11 (69) 1.00
LS Subtype
    Circumscribed Superficial 1 5
    Circumscribed Deep 3 1
    Generalized Morphea 0 3
    Linear Trunk/Limb 6 0
    Linear Face 0 4
    Mixed Morphea 1 3
    Pansclerotic Morphea
    Eosinophilic Fasciitis
Laboratory Evaluation*
    ANA Positive 6 (55) 4 (27) 0.23
    ssDNA Positive 5 (46) 5 (33) 0.69
    AHA Positive 4 (36) 8 (57) 0.43
    CPK Elevated 4 (36) 5 (36) 1.00
    Aldolase Elevated 5 (45) 2 (15) 0.18
Extracutaneous Manifestations
    At least one ECM 4 (36) 8 (50) 0.70

Relapse
mean (SD)
No Relapse
mean (SD)
p-value

Age Onset (years) 11.34 (3.53) 7.14 (3.51) < 0.01
Treatment Duration (mos) 38.92 (15.67) 44.99 (13.28) 0.29
Follow-up Duration (years) 5.05 (1.89) 5.72 (1.59) 0.99
2

P-values were obtained using Chi-squared tests for categorical variables and Fisher exact tests when n<5 for a cell. Independent sample t-tests were used for continuous variables. P-values not provided for subtypes, as sample sizes were extremely low.

*

Laboratory parameters not obtained for all patients so denominators are provided

ANA (antinuclear antibody), ssDNA (single stranded DNA antibody), AHA (antihistone antibody), CPK (creatine phosphokinase)