Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar;11(3):708–716. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.02.89

Table 1. Characteristics of patients with complex ASD and inferior-posterior rim deficiency.

Patient Age (years) Weight (kg) Rim deficiency ASD index size (mm/m2) ASD size (mm) Device size (mm) Imaging guidance Success Complications
1 85 60 IP 16 26 28 ICE Yes None
2 1.4 9 IP 35 17 18 TEE Yes None
3 67 97 IP 15 30 32 ICE Yes None
4 10 37 IP; SP 24.4 30 32 TEE Yes Device embolization
5 12 24 IP 26.5 26 30 TEE Yes Device embolization
6 16 33 IP 22.5 30 32 TEE No None
7 32 50 IP; SP 27.2 40 40 ICE Yes Pericardial effusion
8 6 20 IP 35.7 25 30 TEE Yes Device embolization
9 55 51 IP 26.5 40 40 ICE Yes None
10 6 14 IP 33 21 22 TEE Yes Right-to-left shunt
11 3 14.5 IP 32 21 22 TEE Yes None
12 6 24 IP; SP 22 20 22 TEE Yes Device embolization
13 3 13 IP 32 18 20 TEE No None
14 6 17.5 IP; I 23 17 18 TEE Yes Right-to-left shunt
15 6 24 IP 28 30 28 TEE No None
16 8 20 IP 29 24 26 TEE No None
17 17.7 95 IP; I 20.5 39 40 TEE Yes None
18 1.6 9.2 IP 51 22 20 TEE Yes Complete atrioventricular block

ASD, atrial septal defect; ICE, intracardiac echocardiography; TEE, transesophageal echocardiography; IP, inferior-posterior rim; I, inferior rim; SP, superior-posterior rim.