Finding #19 | |
Doctors valued the contribution of nurses in collaborative practices when this reduced their own workload. | |
Assessment for each CERQual component | |
Methodological limitations | Minor concerns because 4 studies did not report reflexivity; 1 study did not report ethical consideration. However, these may not have influenced the findings. |
Coherence | Moderate concerns because most of studies stated that contribution of nurses in collaborative practices reduced doctors workloads, but in 2 study doctors reported that as a result of practice nurse services, their working hours had not changed. |
Relevance | Minor concerns, as 4 regions were represented and majority of data are related to HIC. |
Adequacy | No or very minor concerns. |
Overall CERQual assessment | |
Moderate confidence | Due to minor concerns about methodological limitations and relevance; and moderate concerns about coherence. |
Contributing studies/setting | |
Sub‐Saharan Africa (1); Europe (7); North America (3); Oceania (1) Coulter 2000: USA, managed care organisation/multispeciality group practices Dierick‐van Daele 2010a: Netherland, general practice Drew 2002: UK, primary care Drew 2003: UK, primary care Georgeu 2012: South Africa, primary care Hamel 2017: Slovenia and Spain, primary care Kaasalainen 2013: Canada, primary care Ljungbeck 2017: Sweden, municipal healthcare Lorch 2015: Australia, chlamydia testing Lovink 2018: Netherlands, primary care Marsden 2004: UK, practices Peterson 2007: Canada, primary care Stenner 2010: UK, primary care |