Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 12;8(3):347. doi: 10.3390/jcm8030347

Table 9.

Meta-analysis results of the PTPN22 1858 C/T polymorphism from genome wide association studies showing significant p-value (5 × 10−8 < p< 0.05).

Author, Year NO. of studies Comparison OR (95% CI) p-Value Model Disease Ethnicity I2 (%) Power OR 1.2 Power OR 1.5 FPRP Values at Prior Probability BFDP 0.001 BFDP 0.000001
OR 1.2 OR 1.5
0.001 0.000001 0.001 0.000001
Merkel PA, 2017 [51S] 3 T vs. C 1.36 (1.21–1.53) 1.86 × 10−7 - ANCA Overall European ancestry 0.019 0.948 0.016 0.943 0.000 0.247 0.019 0.020 0.953
Törn C, 2015 [52S] 3 T vs. C 2.42 (1.70–3.44) 1.01 × 10−6 - T1DM vs. Ab- Caucasian children 0.000 0.004 0.948 1,000 0.180 0.995 0.000 0.601 0.999
Serrano A, 2013 4 T vs. C 1.51 (1.28–1.79) 2.0 × 10−6 F GCA Caucasian 0.004 0.469 0.336 0.998 0.004 0.814 0.004 0.151 0.994
Thompson SD, 2010 [53S] 3 Recessive 1.63 (1.35–1.97) 3.12 × 10−7 - JIA Germany +Texas +Utah 0.001 0.195 0.360 0.998 0.002 0.689 0.001 0.062 0.985

GCA, giant cell arteritis; PsA, psoriatic arthritis; JIA, juvenile idiopathic arthritis; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; ANCA, antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody; GPA, granulomatosis with polyangiitis; MPA, microscopic polyangiitis; PR3, proteinase 3; cANCA, cytoplasmic ANCA; MPO, myeloperoxidase; pANCA, perinuclear ANCA; MG, myasthenia gravis; OR, odds ratio; R, random; FPRP, false-positive report probability; BFDP, Bayesian false discovery probability. Each comparison of genetic associations was regarded as noteworthy when FPRP of <0.2 or BFDP of <0.8 or both are fulfilled and the values were bolded when the results are significant by FPRP or BFDP.