Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 26;11(1 Suppl):4–18. doi: 10.1177/1758573218768099

Table 3.

Overview of human studies evaluating scaffold augmentation of rotator cuff repair.

Study Study type Sample size Follow-up Results and conclusions
Lenart et al.83 Case series n = 16 Mean 1.5 years PLL patch augmentation reported significant improvements in functional outcomes but had a retear rate of 62%
Ciampi et al.84 Cohort study n = 152 Two, 12, 36 months Polypropylene patch augmentation for RCR significantly improved function, strength, and retear rates at 36 months.
Proctor47 Case series n = 18 Six, 12, and 42 months PLL bioabsorbable synthetic patch successfully reinforced surgical repair of large to massive RCR at 12 (83%) and 42 (78%) months.
Encalada-Diaz et al.18 Case series n = 10 Two and four weeks Three, six, and 12 months PCPU patch was well tolerated with a 10% retear rate at 12 months.
Gupta et al.77 Case series n = 27 Minimum two years Dermal tissue matrix xenograft group demonstrated improved pain, AROM, and subjective outcomes (ASES and SF-12 scores) and US revealed intact cuff reconstruction.
Barber et al.82 RCT n = 42 Mean 14.5 months Acellular dermal human allograft augmentation of large (>3 cm) tears involving two tendons showed better ASES and Constant scores. MRI revealed 85% intact repair in treatment versus 40% in controls (p < 0.01).
Phipatanakul and Petersen79 Case series n = 11 Minimum two years Porcine SIS xenograft did not reconstitute rotator cuff tissue or improve the quality of the RCR.
Badhe et al.78 Case series n = 10 Six weeks, three and 12 months PDC patch demonstrated excellent pain relief with moderate improvement in AROM and strength for chronic tears.
Walton et al.81 Case control n = 19 Three, six, and 24 months The ROI xenograft group had persisting cuff deficits, no clinical advantage compared to the control group, and a high proportion suffered a severe inflammatory reaction.
Iannotti et al.80 RCT n = 30 One year Porcine SIS augmentation did not improve tendon healing or clinical outcomes for large and massive RCR compared to controls.

AROM: active range of motion; ASES: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; PCPU: polycarbonate polyurethane; PDC: porcine dermal collagen; PLL: poly-L-lactide; RCR: rotator cuff repair; RCT: randomized control trial; ROI: Restore orthobiologic implant; SIS: small intestinal submucosa; US: ultrasound.