Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 4;10(2):368–377. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12368

Table 4.

Univariate and multivariate analyses for progression‐free survival

Variable Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
HR 95% CI P HR 95% CI P
Age
≥70 vs. <70 years 1.19 0.77–1.84 0.420
Stage at diagnosis
Metastatic disease vs. locally advanced 1.88 1.22–2.90 0.004 1.84 1.11–3.04 0.017
Diabetes
Yes vs. no 0.98 0.62–1.56 0.961
ECOG PS
≥1 vs. 0 1.40 0.89–2.22 0.143
BMI
>25 vs. 18.5–25 kg/m2 0.84 0.53–1.32 0.460
Site of primary tumour
Body–tail vs. head 1.06 0.69–1.63 0.762
Δ SMI
≥10% vs. <10% 1.82 1.06–3.13 0.029 2.31 1.30–4.09 0.004
Visceral fat
≥44 vs. <44 cm3/h2 2.45 1.34–4.49 0.003 2.98 1.41–6.28 0.004
Δ Karnofsky PS
≥20% vs. <20% 1.97 1.08–3.60 0.027 1.43 0.63–3.23 0.383
Nutritional assessment
Yes vs. no 0.77 0.48–1.24 0.294
Nutritional supplementation
Yes vs. no 1.06 0.68–1.63 0.791
Δ Body weight
≥10% vs. <10% 2.60 1.03–6.59 0.043

The bold values are variables statistically significant in univariate and multivariate analysis.

Δ, from baseline to first radiological assessment; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.