Khan 2011.
Methods |
Allocation: randomised trial, alternation Design: parallel‐group |
|
Participants |
Number randomised: 62 Age range: 15 to 35 Gender: 74% males Setting: hospital, Pakistan Inclusion criteria: not specifically stated Exclusion criteria: other associated illness Participant characteristics: mean age = 24.6 years |
|
Interventions | Needle aspiration versus incision and drainage Intervention group: needle aspiration n = 31 Comparator group: incision and drainage n = 31 Use of additional interventions: antibiotics (injection benzyl penicillin and metronidazole), analgesics |
|
Outcomes | 1. Recurrence rate 2. Length of hospital stay (Outcomes not specified as primary/secondary) |
|
Funding sources | Not specified | |
Declarations of interest | Not specified | |
Notes | Needle aspiration failures treated with incision and drainage Participants lost to follow‐up: none |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Randomisation method not specified |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No allocation concealment specified |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | No mention of blinding made; probably not done |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | No mention of blinding made; probably not done |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | All patients presumably accounted for (admitted as inpatients); no dropouts stated |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit a judgement of high or low risk |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Not enough data to assess other risk of bias. Incomplete methodological description (definition of recurrence/criteria for re‐intervention not described, timing of assessment for recurrence not described). |