Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 23;2016(12):CD006287. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006287.pub4

Khan 2011.

Methods Allocation: randomised trial, alternation
Design: parallel‐group
Participants Number randomised: 62
Age range: 15 to 35
Gender: 74% males
Setting: hospital, Pakistan
Inclusion criteria: not specifically stated
Exclusion criteria: other associated illness
Participant characteristics: mean age = 24.6 years
Interventions Needle aspiration versus incision and drainage
Intervention group: needle aspiration
n = 31
Comparator group: incision and drainage
n = 31
Use of additional interventions: antibiotics (injection benzyl penicillin and metronidazole), analgesics
Outcomes 1. Recurrence rate
2. Length of hospital stay
(Outcomes not specified as primary/secondary)
Funding sources Not specified
Declarations of interest Not specified
Notes Needle aspiration failures treated with incision and drainage
Participants lost to follow‐up: none
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Randomisation method not specified
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No allocation concealment specified
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk No mention of blinding made; probably not done
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk No mention of blinding made; probably not done
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk All patients presumably accounted for (admitted as inpatients); no dropouts stated
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information to permit a judgement of high or low risk
Other bias Unclear risk Not enough data to assess other risk of bias. Incomplete methodological description (definition of recurrence/criteria for re‐intervention not described, timing of assessment for recurrence not described).