Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 31;2016(10):CD005134. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005134.pub3

Shen 2014.

Methods Randomised controlled study
Participants Total number of participants enrolled: 121
Number of participants allocated to each group: fondaparinux (FX) group: 59, nadroparin calcium (NA) group: 57
Number of participants excluded and/or lost to follow‐up: not mentioned
Inclusion: clinical diagnosis of oesophageal carcinoma and planned for oesophagectomy; clinical diagnosis of lung carcinoma and planned for lung resection; general anaesthesia combined with epidural anaesthesia
Exclusion: blood clotting dysfunction before surgery; anticoagulating or antiplatelet history before surgery; low blood platelet count; haemorrhagic disease; cerebral haemorrhage; cerebral, spinal or ophthalmologic operation history; peptic ulcer; bleeding > 400 mL during operation; bleeding > 100 mL/h after operation; blood transfusion during or after operation; severe renal or liver dysfunction; severe hypertension
Interventions FX: 2.5 mg IH once daily after operation
NA: nadroparin calcium 4100 AxaIU IH once daily after operation
Outcomes Primary efficacy outcomes: VTE events and drainage volume
Notes Use of adjunctive anticoagulative methods: not reported
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Study authors confirmed that they used the computer‐derived randomisation table.
 Comment: low risk of bias
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Study authors confirmed that they used the computer‐derived randomisation table.
 Comment: low risk of bias
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk The study publication did not clearly describe methods of blinding, and communication with study authors did not provide further information.
Comment: unclear
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Study authors confirmed that outcome assessors did not know the group information.
 Comment: low risk of bias
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Quote: "A total of 121 patients were enrolled in this study, and 116 eligible patients were randomly assigned (Group H: 57 patients; Group F: 59 patients)"
Comment: low risk of bias
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Results of VTE rates were reported, but the number of events was not clearly reported. Drainage volumes of study participants were reported.
Other bias Low risk No risk of other bias was identified.