Methods | Randomised, parallel group, open‐label study conducted in 2 centres in the UK 4 treatment arms: CBZ, sodium valproate, phenytoin, PB |
|
Participants | Adults with newly diagnosed epilepsy (2 or more untreated partial or generalised tonic‐clonic seizures in the 12 months preceding the study) Number randomised: PB = 58, CBZ = 61 49 participants (41%) with partial epilepsy 55 (46%) male participants Mean age (range): 32 (13 to 77) years Range of follow‐up: 1 to 91 months |
|
Interventions | Monotherapy with PB or CBZ. Median daily dose achieved: PB = 105 mg/day; CBZ = 600 mg/day | |
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes | We received IPD for all outcomes of this review. | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Randomisation list generated using permuted blocks of size 8 or 16 with stratification for centre, seizure type and presence of neurological signs. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Allocation concealed via 4 batches of concealed opaque envelopes. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Unblinded, authors state masking of treatment would not be “practical” and would have “introduced bias due to a very large dropout rate.” Lack of blinding may have lead to more withdrawals of PB. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Unblinded, authors state masking of treatment would not be “practical” and would have “introduced bias due to a very large dropout rate.” Lack of blinding may have lead to more withdrawals of PB which is likely to have influenced the overall results. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Attrition rates reported, all randomised participants analyses from IPD provided² |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All outcomes reported or calculated with IPD provided² |
Other bias | Low risk | No other bias detected |