Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 23;2016(12):CD010263. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010263.pub2

Harazaki 1997.

Methods Trial design: RCT, 3 groups
Location: Department of Orthodontics, Tokyo Dental College, Japan
Number of centres: 1
Participants SELECTION CRITERIA
• Receiving edgewise orthodontic therapy
• Undergoing orthodontic treatment with fixed upper and lower appliances
Participants: 84 (27 male, 57 female)
Number randomised: 84 (Group 1: 44 ; Group 2: 20; Group 3: 20)
Number evaluated: 84 (Group 1: 44 ; Group 2: 20; Group 3: 20)
Age range: 11 years to 34 years
Interventions INTERVENTION: Either a laser irradiation group receiving laser therapy for 30 seconds at the apical region of each tooth from a labial or lingual direction (Group 2)
or a blind irradiation group receiving the same therapy without irradiation (Group 3)
CONTROL: No irradiation (Group 1)|
Outcomes Questionnaire involving 5 questions exploring the timing at which the pain commenced, when pain peaked and abated, and exploring the nature and severity of the discomfort
Notes We could not extract any usable data from this paper
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Not mentioned
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not mentioned
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk A blind irradiation placebo group was included in the study
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Participants were blinded in groups 1 and 2
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No drop‐outs
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Study protocol not available, but outcomes mentioned in the methods section appeared to have been reported
Other bias Unclear risk Not enough detail provided to allow an assessment