Sweetow 2006.
Methods | Randomised cross‐over trial | |
Participants | N = 65 across 5 sites Age: range ‐ trained 28 to 85 (average 63.15); control 32 to 82 (average 64.2 years) |
|
Interventions | Home‐based interactive PC‐based program (Listening and Communication Enhancement LACE) 30 minutes 5 times a week for 4 weeks |
|
Outcomes | Short‐term: 4 weeks ‐ QuickSIN, Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) (SPEECH PERCEPTION), HHIE/A (HANDICAP), Communication Scale for Older Adults (COMMUNICATION) | |
Notes | Group 2 cross‐over arm – as there were no significant differences between group 1 and cross‐over arm of group 2 they pooled the data for these groups meaning we cannot use the data. Also data from HA users mixed with non‐users. This means that the data from this study have not been included in any meta‐analysis Outcomes for a 'subset' of participants – not clear how this set was decided on |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No details of sequence generation |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No details of randomisation protocol |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | This study was not blinded due to the nature of the intervention |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | No apparent blinding of outcome assessment |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | Some confusion over numbers for how many started and completed in each group. N is stated as 65 but this is not the number randomised – it is the number who completed. Number randomised is unclear |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | No protocol available |
Other bias | High risk | Participants at one of the sites were paid Data not available separately for users versus non‐users, for different sites or for the 2 arms of the trial The authors have a financial interest in the company that produces the intervention LACE |